Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pytest-asyncio (changelog) ~= 0.23.0 -> ~=0.24.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio)

v0.24.0: pytest-asyncio 0.24.0

Compare Source

0.24.0 (2024-08-22)
  • BREAKING: Updated minimum supported pytest version to v8.2.0
  • Adds an optional loop_scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio. This argument controls which event loop is used to run the marked async test. #​706, #​871
  • Deprecates the optional scope keyword argument to pytest.mark.asyncio for API consistency with pytest_asyncio.fixture. Users are encouraged to use the loop_scope keyword argument, which does exactly the same.
  • Raises an error when passing scope or loop_scope as a positional argument to @pytest.mark.asyncio. #​812
  • Fixes a bug that caused module-scoped async fixtures to fail when reused in other modules #​862 #​668

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pytest-asyncio-0.x branch from 78be176 to cb2c459 Compare August 28, 2024 07:17
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to ~=0.24.0 chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to ~=0.24.0 - autoclosed Aug 28, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Aug 28, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/pytest-asyncio-0.x branch August 28, 2024 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants